To help speed up the processing of an ever-increasing number of cases, a certain relationship forms in courtrooms between the main actors in the system, including the judge, defense counsel and prosecutor. What immediately fascinated me was the way the recurring members of the courtroom interacted with each other, as if they were one big happy family.
Robert Sanders Running head: As well as other factors that work for the court system. The Courtroom Workgroup Courtroom workgroup is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and the judicial officer.
Courtroom workgroups observe the way courts come to decisions.
The courtroom workgroup has four concepts that recognize speed, practical skepticism, collegiality, and confidentiality. The courtroom workgroup seeks to process cases rather than disposing justice.
The Courtroom work group interacts on a daily basis with judges who fulfill roles such as issuing warrants, making feasible cause determinations, surrendering bail, denying bail, presiding over hearings, ruling motions, and presiding over trials.
The changes to be made are to improve the cases being heard the workgroup is too focused on speed they need to be concerned about evidence. The changes that I would make to the courtroom group would be towards scheduling of major and minor crimes, major or federal crimes, take up more time and more money.
I would have a specific judge, usually a federal judge to handle major cases, for minor cases I would schedule a certain amount of cases a day, as well as court on Saturdays; this would decrease a lot of the back log.
The next change would be to have fewer jurors make it 6 maximum for federal and local trials. Then I would make the punishment for minor crimes a lot tougher and sentencing longer, which hopefully would deter these crimes from happening.
Prosecutors typically become involved in a criminal case once a suspect has been identified and charges need to be filed. Prosecutors are typically employed by the government offices, and some are backed by the power of the state.
Most prosecutors pursue cases that they believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecutors also use their discretion when taking cases because they are able to look at the circumstances of a case, past criminal record, and deciding what and whether to make charges.
Prosecutors are able to file charges on all crimes for which the police arrest suspects, and are able to file charges more severe than the charges the police filed. The effects of the criminal justice funnel and the backlog of cases on the court system and work group refers to the method which the quantity of criminal matters awaiting is decreased until a low percentage of cases acquired are resolved by trial advocacy and confinement.
The funnel prevents the criminal justice system from becoming overburdened and decreased trials and incarceration saves money and time. A disadvantage to this matter at hand could acquire less serious offenders getting put on probation or simply committing other crimes.
Some factors include the volume controlled substance cases, poor communication among the courtroom workgroup and others resulting in unnecessary testing, lack of staff, and resources.
The funnel effect shows there are more suspects and defendants than initial inmates because of numerous reasons the criminal is being filtered out of the funnel.
The criminal justice system has less access to crime and allowing criminals to escape the court system. I think that if the criteria for taking a case by both the prosecutor, and the defense were less you would have federal crimes being tried by local court groups and the backlog would increase, you would have federal prosecutors trying misdemeanors, and local defense teams defending federal cases, the court group would be in a tail spin.
If the criteria was more stringent then there would be less cases taking up more time and useful recourses un-necessarily the courtroom work groups would be over worked and this would put a strain on everybody and some criminals would be free to possibly commit more crimes.
This also would be a burden on the economy, and for the taxpayers.Prosecutor's Role: The prosecutors represents the people within a given jurisdiction.
Even though a crime may have a particular victim or group of victims. Dec 02, · The courtroom workgroup consist of the judge, baliff, witness, jury, court reporter, the prosecutor, the defense attorney, and a courtroom sketch artist.
The role of each is as follows. The judge presides over court proceedings from the "bench," which is usually an elevated r-bridal.com: Resolved. Identify and explain the roles of the various professional members of the courtroom work group Discuss indigent defense, and know what forms it takes in the United States Identify and explain the roles of the various nonprofessional courtroom participants.
the professional courtroom actors, including judegs, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, public defenders, and others who earn a living serving the court defense counsel a licensed trial lawyer, hired or appointed to conduct the legal defense of a person accused of a crime and to represent him or her before a court of law.
May 27, · Prosecutors: The prosecutors have the most power in the courtroom workgroup because it’s their decision to determine whether or not to charge the defendant or which charges are appropriate.
A prosecutor decides whether to go forward with a case even if the victim doesn’t want to or they can drop or change the charges against. the Criminal Courtroom Workgroup Richard Young* Abstract: The concept of the courtroom workgroup has become a standard way of explaining patterns of decisions produced by, and dy-namics within, criminal trial courts in common law jurisdictions.